英美法案例翻譯
發問:
If I place an advertisement that I wish to sell my Chevrolet for $5,000, can the newspaper sell my Cadillac or my Chalet for $5,000? More to the point, can the newspaper bind me to a contract to sell my Chevrolet for $500? $50? $5? I think not. And if not, the questionshould surely not be left to the vagaries of... 顯示更多 If I place an advertisement that I wish to sell my Chevrolet for $5,000, can the newspaper sell my Cadillac or my Chalet for $5,000? More to the point, can the newspaper bind me to a contract to sell my Chevrolet for $500? $50? $5? I think not. And if not, the question should surely not be left to the vagaries of a jury trial. I would affirm based upon the foregoing analysis and structure that affirmance either upon harmless error or a right for the wrong reason hypothesis. I therefore respectfully dissent. ON MOTION FOR REHEARING PER CURIAM. Denied. DOWNEY and HERSEY, JJ., concur. WARNER, J., concurs specially with opinion.WARNER, Judge, concurring. It appears that the motions for rehearing are directed at the language I used in my concurring opinion in this case. Therefore some elucidation is necessary. In this case, the majority opinion in which I concurred held that it was error to instruct the jury that the issue in this case was whether or not appellee intended by its newspaper advertisement to offer a jackpot of $825,000. The opinion pointed out that it was clear that appellant had not subjectively intended to offer the large jackpot. Therefore giving of the FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLY Page 4 585 So.2d 949, 16 Fla. L. Weekly 797, 16 Fla. L. Weekly D2206 (Cite as: 585 So.2d 949) © 2009 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 幫忙翻議一下 感恩!!!
最佳解答:
如果我安置一個廣告我希望為$5,000賣我的薛佛列汽車，報紙能為$5,000賣我的卡迪拉克或我的瑞士山中的牧人小屋？ 更多對點，報紙能束縛我對合同為$500賣我的薛佛列汽車？ $50? $5? 我認為不會。 如果不，不應該 肯定留下問題給陪審團審訊的狂妄古怪的行為。 我會肯定基於斷言在無害的錯誤或權利為錯誤原因假說的前面分析和結構。 因此I恭敬地持異議。 在行動為複審 每CURIAM。 否認。 DOWNEY和HERSEY， JJ。，同意。 華納， J.，特別地同意opinion.WARNER，法官，同意公職補習班樂學網。 看起來行動為複審被指揮在我在這種情況下使用按我的同時發生的意見的語言。 所以一些說明是必要的。 在這種情況下，我同意的多數取決保持它是錯誤指示陪審員問題在這種情況下是否appellee由它的報紙廣告意欲提供困境$825,000。 觀點指出它確切上訴未主觀地意欲提供大困境。 所以給為仅教育用途第4頁 585 So.2d 949， 16 Fla. L. 每週797， 16 Fla. L. 每週D2206 (援引如下： 585 So.2d 949) 2009年Thomson路透社。 沒有要求對Orig。 美國Gov。 工作。
其他解答:論語翻譯全文10449D54D250ED3E
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
